2003 Supreme Court term

Till v. SCS Credit Corp.

Dockets 02-1016Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

According to Petitioners, the dispute centers on how to calculate deferred payments required under section 1325(a)(5)(B)(ii) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Petitioners argue that deferred payments must equal the present value of the collateral, which they say is an objective concept reflecting the real interest rate and inflation.

According to Mr. Brunstad, respondent argues that a secured creditor in a Chapter 13 cramdown is not seeking profit but merely trying to mitigate the large losses it would otherwise suffer.

According to Mr. Brunstad, respondent also points to studies indicating that the success rate of Chapter 13 plans is low, with failure rates as high as 97 percent in some jurisdictions.

Background and question before the Court

According to Chief Justice, qUESTION: When you say traditionally it's been understood to mean real interest rate plus time value of money, it means real interest rate for the particular lender. Isn't -- I mean, the -- the interest rate that is given to different lenders is not always the same.

According to Justice, qUESTION: Well, why isn't that a valid distinction?

According to Justice, qUESTION: Would it satisfy you if we said this?

According to Justice, qUESTION: But no. But does what I say satisfy you?

According to Chief Justice, qUESTION: But it seems pretty obvious if it's a higher rate, there are going to be more defaults.

According to Chief Justice Rehnquist, qUESTION: Thank you, Ms. Harper. The case is submitted.

What each side argues

Till (Petitioner)

According to Petitioners, deferred payments under §1325(a)(5)(B)(ii) must equal the present value of the collateral, an objective concept reflecting the real interest rate and inflation.

SCS Credit Corp. (Respondent)

According to Mr. Brunstad, a secured creditor in a Chapter 13 cramdown is not trying to make a profit but is merely trying to mitigate the enormous losses it would otherwise suffer.

According to Mr. Brunstad, studies show that the success rate of Chapter 13 plans can be as low as 3 percent, with failure rates up to 97 percent in some jurisdictions.

What happened at oral argument

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 40bdf504739c0870d521-r1-15f8483fa7a92f20.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 20, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.