2002 Supreme Court term

FORD MOTOR COMPANY and CITIBANK (South Dakota , N.A. v. JOHN B. McCAULEY, ET AL.

Dockets 01-896Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

Guide pending. Verified case metadata and available source documents are shown below while a supported explanation is prepared.

Background and question before the Court

According to Petitioners, another issue is whether administrative costs can be counted toward the amount in controversy.

What each side argues

Petitioners

Petitioners contend that allowing administrative costs to count toward the amount in controversy would vastly expand the federal caseload.

Respondent

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

What happened at oral argument

Justice Ginsburg asked about the cost to the defendant under a test assuming a single plaintiff.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

According to Petitioners, resolution of whether administrative costs count toward the amount in controversy may impact the federal courts’ docket size.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 2c7239a525faf0bbf30c-r1-3348d4b4178577c7.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 20, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.