2002 Supreme Court term

DIRECTOR, SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE ET AL. v. HYUNG JOON KIM.

Dockets 01-1491Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

According to Petitioners, congress concluded that the prompt removal of aliens convicted of serious felonies is essential to the Nation's ability to control its borders.

According to Petitioners, the Court has consistently applied a rational‑basis test to determine whether a congressional objective is likely to advance a legitimate governmental purpose.

According to Respondent, the statute at issue requires the government to detain lawful permanent‑resident aliens not because they pose a flight risk, but because they have been convicted of certain crimes.

Eighty‑five percent of aliens placed in removal proceedings do not challenge the immigration decision, and more than half of those cases are resolved within thirty days.

Background and question before the Court

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

What each side argues

Petitioner Position

According to Petitioners, congress has determined that swift removal of aliens convicted of serious felonies is vital for border control.

According to Petitioners, the appropriate judicial test is a rational‑basis analysis of whether the congressional objective is likely to further a legitimate governmental purpose.

Respondent Position

According to Respondent, the statute mandates detention of lawful permanent‑resident aliens solely because of prior convictions, not because they pose a flight risk.

What happened at oral argument

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Eighty‑five percent of aliens placed in removal proceedings do not challenge the immigration decision, and more than half of those cases are resolved within thirty days.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 48f33b662ff86ba46520-r1-1af832f80e08b135.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 19, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.